Weekly Feature- The Turtle: Submarine Warfare During the Revolution

David Bushnell is credited with designing the first submarine used for military purposes.  He is also the architect behind a humorous attack again the British shipping in the Delaware River in early 1778.

Bushnell was born in Saybrook, (now Westbrook) Connecticut, in the year 1742.  He graduated from Yale in 1775 and set to work on submarine warfare.  Sergeant Ezra Lee was the man who first used Bushnell’s submarine (called the Turtle because of its shape) in battle.  Lee was interviewed by Charles Griswold in the early nineteenth century.  Lee provided Griswold with this description of the Turtle.[1]

According to this interview, Lee described the Turtle as being made of several pieces of large oak timber fitted together in the shape of a “round clam.”  It was held together with iron bands, and the seams were corked before the whole machine was covered in tar to prevent water from seeping into the machine.  The operator would enter from the top, by moving a metallic piece which opened upon hinges.[2]

Six pieces of thick glass were placed at the top of the machine so light could enter.  About seven hundred pounds of lead were fixed to the bottom of the Turtle so that it remained balanced.  Two hundred pounds of this lead could be released to increase the buoyancy of the machine.  “But to enable the navigator when under water, to rise or sink at pleasure, there were two forcing pumps, by which water could be pressed out at the bottom; and also a spring, by applying the foot to which, a passage was formed for the admission of water.”[3]

Steering was done by a rudder, whose tiller passed through the inside of the machine. “But not the least ingenious part of this curious machine, was that by which the horizontal motion was communicated to it.  This object was effected by means of two oars or paddles, formed precisely like the arms of a wind-mill, which revolved perpendicularly upon an axletree that projected in front; this axletree passed into the machine at a water joint, and was furnished with a crank, by which it was turned : the navigator being seated inside, with one hand laboured at the crank, and with the other steered by the tiller.”  Two similar, though smaller, paddles were located near the top of the machine to assist in the ascension of the machine.  The operator of the machine would attack by affixing its magazine to the target ship using a screw.[4]

That piece, of similar make and shape to the Turtle, was filled with over one hundred and thirty pounds of gunpowder, a clock, and a gun lock.  It was affixed to the back of the machine, above the rudder, “by means of a screw, one end of which passed quite into the magazine, and there operated as a stop upon the movements of the clock, whilst its other end entered the machine.  This screw could be withdrawn from the magazine, by which the latter was immediately detached, and the clock commenced going.”  The clock ran for twenty or thirty minutes before the lock struck and ignited the powder.[5]

David Bushnell had trained three men in the operation of the Turtle.  Ezra Bushnell, his brother, became sick during this campaign, however, and David Bushnell had to go to his second choice as operator, this being Sergeant Ezra Lee.   The British ship Eagle, of 64 guns commanded by Captain Duncan and bearing Admiral Howe’s flag, was lying off Governor’s Island south of Manhattan during the campaign of 1776 and presented an inviting target.[6]

On the night of September 7, 1776 two or three whaleboats towed Bushnell’s Turtle as close to the British fleet as they felt was safe.  Lee entered the machine and was on his own.  Bushnell, in a speech before the American Philosophical Society on June 8, 1798, stated that Lee “went under the ship and attempted to fasten the wood-screw into her bottom, but struck, as he supposes, a bar of iron. Not being well skilled in the management of the vessel, in attempting to move to another place, he lost the ship, and after seeking her in vain for some time, he rowed some distance and rose to the surface of the water, but found daylight had advanced so far, that he durst not renew the attempt.”[7]

Lee himself, in the interview with Griswold, stated that he “applied the screw, and did all in his power to make it enter, but owing probably in part to the ship’s copper, and the want of an adequate pressure, to enable the screw to get a hold upon the bottom, his attempts all failed.”  Lee tried different parts of the bottom of the Eagle but eventually lost the ship.  He rose to the surface to get his bearings and realized that morning was coming and he was in danger of being discovered.   He dove once more, but as he headed back up river, he realized his compass did not work and he would need to ascend.  As the day was dawning, the British soldiers at Governor’s Island spied him, and they sent out a barge to inspect the curious vessel.  Lee, not wanting the Turtle to be caught, released the magazine in hopes that the British would approach and be killed by the explosion.  The British, however, rowed away from the magazine and from Bushnell’s Turtle.  The magazine eventually drifted into the East River, where it exploded.[8]

The Turtle was eventually sunk by the British near Fort Lee, New Jersey, as it sat upon its transport ship.  Thomas Jefferson later wrote to Bushnell, inquiring about the machine.  Bushnell responded to Jefferson that he had salvaged the machine, but later destroyed it.  The Connecticut River Museum, in Essex, Connecticut, houses a replica of the Turtle.[9]  Thus ended any serious attempts at using submarines in warfare until the U.S. Civil War, when a Confederate submarine, the H.L. Hunley, successfully sank the USS Housatonic, a Union ship, in the waters off Charleston, SC.


The Turtle was not David Bushnell’s only foray into marine warfare during the Revolution.  On January 6, 1778, Bushnell unleashed another of his experiments on the British.

In late December 1777, Bushnell had filled several kegs with powder and set them to explode upon touching anything.  In January, he floated them in the Delaware River, just north of Philadelphia.  Bushnell said, “We set them adrift, to fall with the ebb upon the shipping….As I afterwards found, they were set adrift much too far distant, and did not arrive until after being detained some time by the frost….One of them blew up a boat with several persons in it, who imprudently handled it too freely, and thus gave the British that alarm which brought on the ‘Battle of the Kegs.’”[10]

Major Carl Leopold Baurmeister, of the Hessian troops assisting the British, was in Philadelphia during this “Battle of the Kegs.”  He to a superior in Germany that “the sight of some fifty of these little machines exploding one by one was as beautiful as the enemy’s designs were destructive.”[11]

But it was a satirical letter from Philadelphia dated January 9, 1778, and published in the Pennsylvania Ledger on February 11th, that gives a humorous account: “Both officers and men exhibited the most unparalleled skill and bravery on the occasion; whilst the citizens stood gazing as solemn witnesses of their prowess.  From the Roebuck and other ships of war, whole broadsides were poured into the Delaware.  In short, not a wandering chip, stick, or drift log, but felt the vigour of the British arms.  The action began about sun-rise, and would have been compleated with great success by noon, had not an old market woman coming down the river with provisions, unfortunately let a small keg of butter fall over-board, which (as it was then ebb) floated down to the scene of the action.  At the sight of this unexpected reinforcement of the enemy, the battle was renewed with fresh fury–the firing was incessant till the evening closed the affair.  The kegs were either totally demolished or obliged to fly, as none of them have shewn their heads since.  It is said his Excellency Lord Howe has dispatched a swift sailing packet with an account of this victory to the court of London.  In a word, Monday, the 5th of January, 1778, must ever be distinguished in history, for the memorable BATTLE OF THE KEGS.”[12]

For all of his pioneering work, Bushnell died largely unknown in Georgia, where he was buried in an unmarked grave.

 

 

[1] The American Journal of Science, vol. II, no. 1, 1820, p. 95-98.  That volume can be found here.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Ibid.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Lt.-Commander J.S. Barnes, U.S.N. Submarine Warfare, Offensive and Defensive.  Including a Discussion of the Offensive Torpedo System, Its Effects Upon Iron-Clad Ship Systems, and Influence Upon Future Naval Wars. New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1869, page. 23.
[8] The American Journal of Science, vol. II, no. 1, 1820, p. 95-98.
[9] Ibid.
[10] Lt.-Commander J.S. Barnes, U.S.N., page. 24.
[11] Bernhard A. Uhlendorf & Edna Vosper, editors, Letters from Major Baurmeister to Colonel von Jungkenn Written During the Philadelphia Campaign 1777-1778, Philadelphia: The Historical Society of Pennsylvania, 1937, page. 45.)
[12]   Michael J. Crawford, ed., Naval Documents of the American Revolution Vol. 11, Washington, DC: Department of the Navy,  2005, p. 78.

 

Image credit: “Bushnell’s American Turtle” from the Library of Congress.
A version of this piece previously appeared on the author’s blog.

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s