In “Farmer Refuted,” Alexander Hamilton publicly clashes with a loyalist who is speaking out against the rebellion. The loyalist introduces himself in the first line of the song – “Hear ye, hear ye! My name is Samuel Seabury.” Seabury was a real person; he was an Episcopal rector. Immediately after he introduces himself, he explains his purpose for being there is to “present Free Thoughts on the Proceedings of the Continental Congress.” Those first letters are capitalized because while Seabury and Hamilton didn’t lyrically battle in a public square, they did battle on paper. Seabury’s “Free Thoughts on the Proceedings of the Continental Congress” was actually a pamphlet published anonymously in 1774, placing the musical events off the historical timeline.
In the song, Hamilton’s buddy Hercules Mulligan encourages Hamilton to “Tear this dude apart.” Hamilton did respond with an anonymous writing of his own titled “A Full Vindication of the Measures of the Congress.” In the song, Hamilton and Seabury sing their responses over each other in a counterpoint exchange. I don’t know if Lin-Manuel Miranda purposefully did this, but in reality, Seabury was already writing a second piece while Hamilton was writing “A Full Vindication.” Seabury had to write a postscript in response to “A Full Vindication” before publication of his pamphlet, titled “The Congress Convassed.” Less than a week after Seabury’s work was published, Hamilton responded in Rivington’s New-York Gazetteer with a piece titled “A Card.”
Following that “discussion,” Seabury attempts to recompose himself and continue his speech, but Hamilton literally gets in his face to interrupt each line. Again, this fits the historical reality. Seabury published “A View of the Controversy Between Great-Britain and her Colonies.” Not to be outdone, Hamilton replied again, this time with “The Farmer Refuted.” These two guys really liked to write.
Burr interrupts the discussion, “Alexander, please!” to which Hamilton replies, “Burr, I’d rather be divisive than indecisive.” And he was divisive and decisive. Hamilton continued writing throughout 1775 and into 1776. He wrote “Remarks on the Quebec-Bill” which was published in two parts in Rivington’s New York Gazetteer, the first on June 15, 1775 and the second on the 22nd. Then, between November 9, 1775 and February 8, 1776, Hamilton published fourteen pieces titled “The Monitor” in the New-York Journal. Can someone figure out how much money he spent on ink and parchment?
“Farmer Refuted” (the song) ends with the Company singing “A message from the King!” and as King George III appears on stage, “You’ll Be Back” begins.
In this humorous song, in which the King cannot understand why the colonists are so upset, he tells them, “You’ll be back.” And if not on their own, he sings, “I will send a fully armed battalion to remind you of my love” and later “I will kill your friends and family to remind you of my love.” In reality, King George went before both houses of Parliament on October 27, 1775 to deliver a speech regarding the rebellion and his wish to respond with the military might of the British army and navy in order to bring the rebellious colonists back in line. He informed Parliament that when the “unhappy and deluded multitude…become sensible of their error” he would be ready to receive them “with tenderness and mercy.”
There is one last historical note regarding the King’s line “When you’re gone, I’ll go mad.” Historians believe that King George suffered from a mental illness, possibly mania. Others, however, think medicine he was taking played a role in his madness. Either way, the madness of King George did not stop him from ruling England for sixty years, eight of which he tried to make the colonists “become sensible of their error.”
“Da da da dat da dat da da da da ya da da da dat dat da ya da!”
In the next part, we’ll look at the history behind the lyrics of the eighth song in the musical, “Right Hand Man.”
 After the war, Seabury moved to Connecticut and became the first Anglican bishop ordained on American soil, in 1785.
 The full title: Free thoughts on the proceedings of the Continental Congress, held at Philadelphia, Sept. 5, 1774 : wherein their errors are exhibited, their reasonings confuted, and the fatal tendency of their non-importation, non-exportation, and non-consumption measures, are laid open to the plainest understandings; and the only means pointed out for preserving and securing our present happy constitution : in a letter to the farmers, and other inhabitants of North America in general, and to those of the province of New-York in particular by A Farmer.
 Actually, the full title is A Full Vindication of the Measures of the Congress, from the Calumnies of Their Enemies, in Answer to a Letter, Under the Signature of A.W. Farmer: Whereby His Sophistry is Exposed, His Cavils Confuted, His Artifices Detected, and His Wit Ridiculed ; in a General Address to the Inhabitants of America, and a Particular Address to the Farmers of the Province of New York.
 The full title is The Congress Convassed or, An Examination into the Conduct of the Delegates, at their Grand Convention, Held in Philadelphia.
 That’s it; that’s the full title. Really.
 That didn’t last for long. The full title is A View of the Controversy Between Great-Britain and Her Colonies: Including a Mode of Determining Their Present Disputes, Finally and Effectually; and of Preventing All Future Contentions. In a Letter to the Author of A Full Vindication of the Measures of the Congress, from the Columnies of Their Enemies. By A. W. Farmer, Author of Free Thoughts &c.
 Also not wanting to be outdone on the length of his title, it’s full title is The Farmer Refuted: or A more impartial and comprehensive View of the Dispute between Great-Britain and the Colonies, Intended as a Further Vindication of the Congress: In Answer to a Letter From A. W. Farmer, Intitled A View of the Controversy Between Great-Britain and her Colonies: Including a Mode of determining the present Disputes Finally and Effectually, &c.
All of these writings, which were widely read, referenced or referred to two other widely read pieces of the time, John Dickinson’s “Letters from a Farmer, in Pennsylvania, to the Inhabitants of the British Colonies” and Matthew Robinson-Morris’s “Considerations on the Measures Carrying on with Respect to the British Colonies in North America.”