Reviewing a Bad Dunkirk Review

The internet is full of bad takes these days, giving everyone and their mother a publishing platform seems to have had some negative consequences (the humor of me saying that on this platform is not lost on me). This week in “Terrible Takes” I’m going to walk you through a review of Dunkirk in Marie ClaireI Think ‘Dunkirk’ Was Mediocre at Best, and It’s Not Because I’m Some Naive Woman Who Doesn’t Get It” by Mehera Bonner

(This review has no major spoilers) 

Ms. Bonner opens with;

[Dunkirk] specifically seems to cater to a certain type of very pretentious man who would love nothing more than to explain to me why I’m wrong about not liking it

Well Ms. Bonner- I am pretentious, but I don’t particularly care if you liked Dunkirk or not, I did, however, think your enumerated criticisms were silly bordering on infantile.  We do agree though, it has nothing to do with your gender.

Her main criticisms of Dunkirk are that it “felt like an excuse for men to celebrate maleness—which apparently they don’t get to do enough” and “so clearly designed for men to man-out over.”

She goes on to opine “[I]f Nolan’s entire purpose is breaking the established war movie mold and doing something different—why not make a movie about women in World War II? Or—because I know that will elicit cries of “ugh, not everything has to be about feminism, ugh!”—how about any other marginalized group?”

First of all, the film is not “designed for men to male out over”. London Has Fallen is a film to male out over, Die Hard was a movie to male out over, I love me a good film to man out over, Dunkirk, however, was not a movie for men to male out over. It was a somber and sobering look at one of the most important moments in the history of warfare. I’m a bit of a connoisseur of gratuitous testosterone-driven action flicks- and Dunkirk was not one of them. Saving Private Ryan has more characteristics of that than Dunkirk did.

Even if it was “designed for men to male out over”… so what? Is there something terrible about a film promoting masculinity and masculine virtues? You know, that same masculinity which got those men off the beaches, and then brought them back four years later and liberated Europe? WWII was probably one of the great triumphs of heroic masculinity, and I don’t find anything wrong with celebrating that.

The turn she takes which particularly annoyed me the most was “why not make a movie about women in World War II… [or] any other marginalized group?”. This variant of whataboutism rears its head regularly in feminist or post-modern critiques of media. They don’t engage the media on its own merits but opine that it didn’t fit into their worldview.

She’s inferring here the Dunkirk is “just another WWII movie”, and if it was another movie about D-Day, I might be more charitable towards her criticism. But it’s not, it’s about the Dunkirk evacuation, which was one of the most amazing and critical military operations of the 20th century, and had never appeared on the big screen before. Ms. Bonner shows a shocking ignorance of history if she thinks the Dunkirk evacuation was “just another WWII battle.”

She says that, instead of focusing on white men, maybe Nolan should have made a film about “marginalized groups,” by which she means LGBT, women, or ethnic minorities. But if Ms. Bonner could separate herself from her political preclusions for a half a second, she may have thought about the fact that maybe the entire film was about marginalization. The definition of marginalize is: to relegate to an unimportant or powerless position.

Dunkirk opens with a discussion between a senior naval and army officer, where it’s made clear that the British political and military leadership is prepared to essentially abandon about a quarter of a million men on the beach to be killed or captured by the Nazis. Talk about being in “an unimportant or powerless position.”

Despite the uplifting macro-plotline, the entire film is full of British soldiers, sailors, or airmen being “marginalized.” Further, into the movie, we see a graphic scene of a destroyer being sunk and the deaths of all the soldiers below decks. We see men desperately trying to swim to safety only to be incinerated in an oil slick set ablaze. A small cadre of men trapped in a beached merchant ship while the Germans use it for target practice.

“[W]hy not make a movie about women in World War II… [or] any other marginalized group?”. Why not indeed Ms. Bonner. There are stories to be told of ethnic minorities, women, and other minority groups during WWII.

There was recently a movie about Alan Turing who was on the team which cracked the Enigma Code, saving millions of Allied lives. However, due to his sexual orientation, he was prosecuted and chemically castrated by the British Government after the war in a nearly unimaginable show of ingratitude towards a man who singlehandedly helped win the war. Turing should have been a Churchillian hero of WWII instead of relegated to relative obscurity, and The Imitation Game tells his story.

There were Hindu Regiments that fought for the British in the middle east. That entire theater of WWII: Africa, and the Middle East, has been largely neglected by Hollywood. A quarter of a million North African Arabs fought with the Free French Army to liberate France from Germany. The French and British Colonies across the world fought, often alone, and with incredible bravery, against the Nazis and Imperial Japanese.

If you’re so concerned about these stories being told Ms. Bonner, then may I suggest you tell them. You have some skill as a writer, that is how you make your living. Write a script for a film or TV show so compelling that Netflix or Paramount would be insane to pass on it. I mean that earnestly, I want those stories to be added to the cannon of WWII films before they’re forgotten.

But that’s not what Dunkirk was about. It wasn’t about the British Hindu regiments fighting in Egypt, or about French Algerian Forces fighting alongside the allies liberating France. It was about the British Army being evacuated from Dunkirk. Just let it be that, let another film (your film?) tell those other stories.

There were few people, or group, anywhere in the British empire as marginalized, as powerless, as the men on the beaches of Dunkirk in May of 1940. Dunkirk, in addition to being a cinematic masterpiece, showcased the horror and heroics of war. It should serve as a reminder to all of us comfortable, free people walking around today how indebted we are to those who came before us. It should remind us that despite what movies or video games make it look like, war isn’t glamorous.

Image Credit

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s